Model Comparison

Grok 4.5 vs Seed 2.0 LiteWhich is better in 2026?

Grok 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Grok 4.5 vs Seed 2.0 Lite — which is better?

Grok 4.5 (by xAI) and Seed 2.0 Lite (by ByteDance) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Grok 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Seed 2.0 Lite is better at 0 benchmarks. Grok 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Grok 4.5 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose Seed 2.0 Lite if…

  • you are already invested in the ByteDance ecosystem

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Grok 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Seed 2.0 Lite is better at 0 benchmarks.

Grok 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Jul 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok 4.5 specifies input context (500,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok 4.5
Input500,000 tokens
Output- tokens
ByteDance
Seed 2.0 Lite
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Jul 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Grok 4.5 and Seed 2.0 Lite support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Grok 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Seed 2.0 Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Grok 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Seed 2.0 Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok 4.5 was released on 2026-07-16, while Seed 2.0 Lite was released on 2026-02-14.

Grok 4.5 is 5 months newer than Seed 2.0 Lite.

Grok 4.5

Jul 16, 2026

5 days ago

5mo newer
Seed 2.0 Lite

Feb 14, 2026

5 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok 4.5 has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-02-01, while Seed 2.0 Lite has a cutoff of 2024-01-01.

Grok 4.5 has more recent training data (up to 2026-02-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Seed 2.0 Lite (2024-01-01).

Grok 4.5

Feb 2026

2.1 yr newer
Seed 2.0 Lite

Jan 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (500,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (93.0% vs 85.1%)

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok 4.5 and Seed 2.0 Lite side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok 4.5
✓ Preferred
Seed 2.0 Lite
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
xAI
Grok 4.5
ByteDance
Seed 2.0 Lite

FAQ

Common questions about Grok 4.5 vs Seed 2.0 Lite.

Which is better, Grok 4.5 or Seed 2.0 Lite?

Grok 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Grok 4.5 is made by xAI and Seed 2.0 Lite is made by ByteDance. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Grok 4.5 compare to Seed 2.0 Lite in benchmarks?

Grok 4.5 scores GPQA: 93.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 83.3%, Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.1: 76.0%, SWE-Bench Pro: 64.7%, AA-Omniscience Index: 63.0%. Seed 2.0 Lite scores AIME 2025: 93.0%, AIME 2026: 88.3%, GPQA: 85.1%, LiveCodeBench v6: 81.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 73.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok 4.5 and Seed 2.0 Lite?

Grok 4.5 supports 500K tokens and Seed 2.0 Lite supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes Grok 4.5 and Seed 2.0 Lite?

Grok 4.5 is developed by xAI and Seed 2.0 Lite is developed by ByteDance.