The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Comparing Grok Code Fast 1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

xAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok Code Fast 1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is roughly 1.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Grok Code Fast 1 also accepts a larger context window (256,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok Code Fast 1

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 256,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2025

Choose Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

  • cost matters — it's about 1.4x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.20 / M
$0.35 / M
Output price
$1.50 / M
$0.40 / M
Context window
256,000
131,072
Released
Aug 2025
Sep 2024
License
Proprietary
Qwen

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Grok Code Fast 1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Grok Code Fast 1 ($0.20/1M tokens) is 1.7x cheaper than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.35/1M tokens).

For output processing, Grok Code Fast 1 ($1.50/1M tokens) is 3.8x more expensive than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok Code Fast 1 is more expensive than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerxAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input tokens$0.35
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Grok Code Fast 1 accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's 131,072 tokens. Grok Code Fast 1 can generate longer responses up to 10,000 tokens, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is limited to 8,192 tokens.

xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
Input256,000 tokens
Output10,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok Code Fast 1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct uses Qwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok Code Fast 1

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Qwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok Code Fast 1 was released on 2025-08-28, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Grok Code Fast 1 is 11 months newer than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.

Grok Code Fast 1

Aug 28, 2025

12 months ago

11mo newer
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Grok Code Fast 1 is available from xAI. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks, Together.

Grok Code Fast 1

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.35/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok Code Fast 1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok Code Fast 1
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.

Which is better, Grok Code Fast 1 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI) and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Grok Code Fast 1 compare to Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in benchmarks?

Grok Code Fast 1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 70.8%. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.8%, MT-Bench: 93.5%, MBPP: 88.2%, MMLU-Redux: 86.8%, HumanEval: 86.6%.

Is Grok Code Fast 1 cheaper than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Grok Code Fast 1 is 1.7x cheaper for input tokens. Grok Code Fast 1 costs $0.20/M input and $1.50/M output via xai. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.35/M input and $0.40/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Grok Code Fast 1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Grok Code Fast 1 supports 256K tokens and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok Code Fast 1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Key differences include context window (256K vs 131K), input pricing ($0.20 vs $0.35/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Qwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok Code Fast 1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Grok Code Fast 1 is developed by xAI and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.