Model Comparison
Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507Which is better in 2026?
Comparing Grok Code Fast 1 and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Verdict: Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 — which is better?
Grok Code Fast 1 (by xAI) and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
On price, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is roughly 1.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Grok Code Fast 1 if…
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2025
Choose Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 if…
- cost matters — it's about 1.7x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Grok Code Fast 1 and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Grok Code Fast 1 ($0.20/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 ($0.15/1M tokens).
For output processing, Grok Code Fast 1 ($1.50/1M tokens) is 1.9x more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 ($0.80/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Grok Code Fast 1 is more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Grok Code Fast 1's 256,000 tokens. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Grok Code Fast 1 is limited to 10,000 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
Grok Code Fast 1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Grok Code Fast 1 was released on 2025-08-28, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 was released on 2025-07-22.
Grok Code Fast 1 is 1 month newer than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.
Aug 28, 2025
10 months ago
1mo newerJul 22, 2025
11 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Grok Code Fast 1 is available from xAI. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is available from Fireworks, Novita.
Grok Code Fast 1
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Grok Code Fast 1 and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.