Model Comparison
Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3-Coder
Comparing Grok Code Fast 1 and Qwen3-Coder across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Grok Code Fast 1 and Qwen3-Coder don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Grok Code Fast 1 ($0.20/1M tokens) is 1.1x more expensive than Qwen3-Coder ($0.18/1M tokens).
For output processing, Grok Code Fast 1 ($1.50/1M tokens) is 8.3x more expensive than Qwen3-Coder ($0.18/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Grok Code Fast 1 is more expensive than Qwen3-Coder.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 256,000 tokens. Qwen3-Coder can generate longer responses up to 256,000 tokens, while Grok Code Fast 1 is limited to 10,000 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
Grok Code Fast 1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-Coder uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Grok Code Fast 1 was released on 2025-08-28, while Qwen3-Coder was released on 2025-01-01.
Grok Code Fast 1 is 8 months newer than Qwen3-Coder.
Aug 28, 2025
7 months ago
7mo newerJan 1, 2025
1.3 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Grok Code Fast 1 is available from xAI. Qwen3-Coder is available from DeepInfra, Fireworks.
Grok Code Fast 1
Qwen3-Coder
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Qwen3-Coder
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3-Coder