Model Comparison

Grok Imagine Image Pro vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Comparing Grok Imagine Image Pro and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Grok Imagine Image Pro and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok Imagine Image Pro
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok Imagine Image Pro specifies input context (131,072 tokens).

xAI
Grok Imagine Image Pro
Input131,072 tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Grok Imagine Image Pro does not.

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok Imagine Image Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok Imagine Image Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok Imagine Image Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok Imagine Image Pro was released on 2026-02-01, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B was released on 2025-03-27.

Grok Imagine Image Pro is 10 months newer than Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Grok Imagine Image Pro

Feb 1, 2026

2 months ago

10mo newer
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Mar 27, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

xAI
Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Supports multimodal inputs
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
xAI
Grok Imagine Image Pro
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

FAQ

Common questions about Grok Imagine Image Pro vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Grok Imagine Image Pro (xAI) and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B scores DocVQA: 95.2%, VocalSound: 93.9%, GSM8k: 88.7%, GiantSteps Tempo: 88.0%, ChartQA: 85.3%.
Grok Imagine Image Pro supports 131K tokens and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Grok Imagine Image Pro is developed by xAI and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.