Model Comparison

Grok Imagine Image Pro vs Qwen3 235B A22B

Comparing Grok Imagine Image Pro and Qwen3 235B A22B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Grok Imagine Image Pro and Qwen3 235B A22B don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok Imagine Image Pro
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.10
Best providerFireworks
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Grok Imagine Image Pro accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Qwen3 235B A22B's 128,000 tokens. Only Qwen3 235B A22B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok Imagine Image Pro
Input131,072 tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok Imagine Image Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 235B A22B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok Imagine Image Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 235B A22B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok Imagine Image Pro was released on 2026-02-01, while Qwen3 235B A22B was released on 2025-04-29.

Grok Imagine Image Pro is 9 months newer than Qwen3 235B A22B.

Grok Imagine Image Pro

Feb 1, 2026

2 months ago

9mo newer
Qwen3 235B A22B

Apr 29, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Grok Imagine Image Pro is available from xAI. Qwen3 235B A22B is available from Fireworks, DeepInfra, Novita, Together.

Grok Imagine Image Pro

xai logo
xAI

Qwen3 235B A22B

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.10/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

xAI
Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 235B A22B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
xAI
Grok Imagine Image Pro
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B

FAQ

Common questions about Grok Imagine Image Pro vs Qwen3 235B A22B

Grok Imagine Image Pro (xAI) and Qwen3 235B A22B (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
Qwen3 235B A22B scores Arena Hard: 95.6%, GSM8k: 94.4%, BBH: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.8%, MMLU-Redux: 87.4%.
Grok Imagine Image Pro supports 131K tokens and Qwen3 235B A22B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (131K vs 128K), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Grok Imagine Image Pro is developed by xAI and Qwen3 235B A22B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.