The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Hy4 preview vs MAI-Code-1-Flash

Hy4 preview leads the LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 29.3.

Tencent · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Hy4 preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 29.3, ranking #14 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Hy4 preview wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Hy4 preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.1 and ranks #14 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose MAI-Code-1-Flash

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
51.1
#14
29.3
#122
50.7
#11
29.0
#115
39.8
#12
19.8
#96
36.3
#14
10.9
#102
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 3
0 of 3
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Hy4 preview
MAI-Code-1-Flash
39.4#17
21.6#139
31.1#10
10.6#119
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

32 reported for Hy4 preview · 15 for MAI-Code-1-Flash

3 shared

Hy4 preview outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Pro), while MAI-Code-1-Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.

Hy4 preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

License

Usage and distribution terms

Hy4 preview is licensed under Apache 2.0, while MAI-Code-1-Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Hy4 preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

MAI-Code-1-Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Hy4 preview was released on 2026-08-28, while MAI-Code-1-Flash was released on 2026-06-02.

Hy4 preview is 3 months newer than MAI-Code-1-Flash.

Hy4 preview

Aug 28, 2026

1 weeks ago

2mo newer
MAI-Code-1-Flash

Jun 2, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Hy4 preview and MAI-Code-1-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Hy4 preview
✓ Preferred
MAI-Code-1-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Hy4 preview vs MAI-Code-1-Flash.

Which is better, Hy4 preview or MAI-Code-1-Flash?

Hy4 preview leads the LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 29.3. Hy4 preview is made by Tencent and MAI-Code-1-Flash is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Hy4 preview compare to MAI-Code-1-Flash in benchmarks?

Hy4 preview scores GPQA: 92.3%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.4%, WideSearch: 83.9%, MCP Atlas: 83.7%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 82.9%. MAI-Code-1-Flash scores AIME 2026: 92.5%, GPQA: 84.6%, IFBench: 75.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 71.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 71.6%.

What are the main differences between Hy4 preview and MAI-Code-1-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.1 vs 29.3), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Hy4 preview and MAI-Code-1-Flash?

Hy4 preview is developed by Tencent and MAI-Code-1-Flash is developed by Microsoft.