The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Jamba 1.5 Large vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

AI21 Labs · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Jamba 1.5 Large outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro). Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Jamba 1.5 Large

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.00/M input and $8.00/M output

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
1 of 3
2 of 3
Input price
$2.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$8.00 / M
— / M
Context window
256,000
Released
Aug 2024
Feb 2025
License
Jamba Open Model License
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Jamba 1.5 Large outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

364.5B diff

Jamba 1.5 Large has 364.5B more parameters than Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct, making it 1088.1% larger.

AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large
398.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
33.5Bparameters
398.0B
Jamba 1.5 Large
33.5B
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Jamba 1.5 Large specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only Jamba 1.5 Large specifies output context (256,000 tokens).

AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Jamba 1.5 Large does not.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Jamba 1.5 Large

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Jamba 1.5 Large is licensed under Jamba Open Model License, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Jamba 1.5 Large

Jamba Open Model License

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Jamba 1.5 Large was released on 2024-08-22, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-02-28.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is 6 months newer than Jamba 1.5 Large.

Jamba 1.5 Large

Aug 22, 2024

2.0 years ago

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Feb 28, 2025

1.5 years ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Jamba 1.5 Large has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-03-05, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Jamba 1.5 Large's training data extends to 2024-03-05, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct's cutoff date.

Jamba 1.5 Large

Mar 2024

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Jamba 1.5 Large and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Jamba 1.5 Large
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Jamba 1.5 Large vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Jamba 1.5 Large or Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Jamba 1.5 Large is made by AI21 Labs and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Jamba 1.5 Large compare to Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Jamba 1.5 Large scores ARC-C: 93.0%, GSM8k: 87.0%, MMLU: 81.2%, Arena Hard: 65.4%, TruthfulQA: 58.3%. Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQA: 94.8%, Android Control Low_EM: 93.3%, HumanEval: 91.5%, ScreenSpot: 88.5%, MBPP: 84.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Jamba 1.5 Large and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

Jamba 1.5 Large supports 256K tokens and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Jamba 1.5 Large and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Jamba Open Model License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Jamba 1.5 Large and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

Jamba 1.5 Large is developed by AI21 Labs and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.