The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Jamba 1.5 Large vs Qwen3.5-0.8B

Jamba 1.5 Large leads the LLM Stats Score 1.1 to -5.9.

AI21 Labs · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Jamba 1.5 Large leads the overall LLM Stats Score 1.1 to -5.9, ranking #310 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Jamba 1.5 Large wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Jamba 1.5 Large

  • overall performance matters — it scores 1.1 and ranks #310 on LLM Stats
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results

Choose Qwen3.5-0.8B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
1.1
#310
-5.9
#348
1.1
#300
-3.2
#323
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$2.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$8.00 / M
— / M
Context window
256,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Jamba 1.5 Large
Qwen3.5-0.8B
4.9#272
-6.4#314
5.8#159
-4.9#206
5.8#147
-4.9#190
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

8 reported for Jamba 1.5 Large · 20 for Qwen3.5-0.8B

2 shared

Jamba 1.5 Large outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen3.5-0.8B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Jamba 1.5 Large significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

397.2B diff

Jamba 1.5 Large has 397.2B more parameters than Qwen3.5-0.8B, making it 49650.0% larger.

AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large
398.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-0.8B
800,000,000parameters
398.0B
Jamba 1.5 Large
0.8B
Qwen3.5-0.8B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Jamba 1.5 Large specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only Jamba 1.5 Large specifies output context (256,000 tokens).

AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-0.8B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.5-0.8B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Jamba 1.5 Large does not.

Qwen3.5-0.8B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Jamba 1.5 Large

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.5-0.8B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Jamba 1.5 Large is licensed under Jamba Open Model License, while Qwen3.5-0.8B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Jamba 1.5 Large

Jamba Open Model License

Open weights

Qwen3.5-0.8B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Jamba 1.5 Large was released on 2024-08-22, while Qwen3.5-0.8B was released on 2026-03-02.

Qwen3.5-0.8B is 19 months newer than Jamba 1.5 Large.

Jamba 1.5 Large

Aug 22, 2024

2.0 years ago

Qwen3.5-0.8B

Mar 2, 2026

6 months ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Jamba 1.5 Large has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-03-05, while Qwen3.5-0.8B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Jamba 1.5 Large's training data extends to 2024-03-05, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.5-0.8B's cutoff date.

Jamba 1.5 Large

Mar 2024

Qwen3.5-0.8B

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Jamba 1.5 Large and Qwen3.5-0.8B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Jamba 1.5 Large
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.5-0.8B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Jamba 1.5 Large vs Qwen3.5-0.8B.

Which is better, Jamba 1.5 Large or Qwen3.5-0.8B?

Jamba 1.5 Large leads the LLM Stats Score 1.1 to -5.9. Jamba 1.5 Large is made by AI21 Labs and Qwen3.5-0.8B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Jamba 1.5 Large compare to Qwen3.5-0.8B in benchmarks?

Jamba 1.5 Large scores ARC-C: 93.0%, GSM8k: 87.0%, MMLU: 81.2%, Arena Hard: 65.4%, TruthfulQA: 58.3%. Qwen3.5-0.8B scores MMLU-Redux: 59.5%, Global PIQA: 59.4%, C-Eval: 50.5%, MMMLU: 44.3%, IFEval: 44.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Jamba 1.5 Large and Qwen3.5-0.8B?

Jamba 1.5 Large supports 256K tokens and Qwen3.5-0.8B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Jamba 1.5 Large and Qwen3.5-0.8B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (1.1 vs -5.9), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Jamba Open Model License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Jamba 1.5 Large and Qwen3.5-0.8B?

Jamba 1.5 Large is developed by AI21 Labs and Qwen3.5-0.8B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.