Model Comparison

Jamba 1.5 Mini vs QwQ-32B

QwQ-32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Jamba 1.5 Mini outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while QwQ-32B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

QwQ-32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 30 2026 • llm-stats.com
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

19.5B diff

Jamba 1.5 Mini has 19.5B more parameters than QwQ-32B, making it 60.0% larger.

AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Mini
52.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
32.5Bparameters
52.0B
Jamba 1.5 Mini
32.5B
QwQ-32B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Jamba 1.5 Mini specifies input context (256,144 tokens). Only Jamba 1.5 Mini specifies output context (256,144 tokens).

AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Input256,144 tokens
Output256,144 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Apr 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Jamba 1.5 Mini is licensed under Jamba Open Model License, while QwQ-32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Jamba 1.5 Mini

Jamba Open Model License

Open weights

QwQ-32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Jamba 1.5 Mini was released on 2024-08-22, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

QwQ-32B is 7 months newer than Jamba 1.5 Mini.

Jamba 1.5 Mini

Aug 22, 2024

1.7 years ago

QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.2 years ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Jamba 1.5 Mini has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-03-05, while QwQ-32B has a cutoff of 2024-11-28.

QwQ-32B has more recent training data (up to 2024-11-28), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Jamba 1.5 Mini (2024-03-05).

Jamba 1.5 Mini

Mar 2024

QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

8 mo newer

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

AI21 Labs
Larger context window (256,144 tokens)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

QwQ-32B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher GPQA score (65.2% vs 32.3%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B

FAQ

Common questions about Jamba 1.5 Mini vs QwQ-32B

QwQ-32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Jamba 1.5 Mini is made by AI21 Labs and QwQ-32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Jamba 1.5 Mini scores ARC-C: 85.7%, GSM8k: 75.8%, MMLU: 69.7%, TruthfulQA: 54.1%, Arena Hard: 46.1%. QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.
Jamba 1.5 Mini supports 256K tokens and QwQ-32B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (Jamba Open Model License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Jamba 1.5 Mini is developed by AI21 Labs and QwQ-32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.