Model Comparison
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs Muse Spark 1.1Which is better in 2026?
Comparing K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and Muse Spark 1.1 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Verdict: K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs Muse Spark 1.1 — which is better?
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B (by LG AI Research) and Muse Spark 1.1 (by Meta) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
On price, K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is roughly 2.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Muse Spark 1.1 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose K-EXAONE-236B-A23B if…
- cost matters — it's about 2.9x cheaper per token
Choose Muse Spark 1.1 if…
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and Muse Spark 1.1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, K-EXAONE-236B-A23B ($0.60/1M tokens) is 2.1x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($1.25/1M tokens).
For output processing, K-EXAONE-236B-A23B ($1.00/1M tokens) is 4.3x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($4.25/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Muse Spark 1.1 is more expensive than K-EXAONE-236B-A23B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Muse Spark 1.1 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to K-EXAONE-236B-A23B's 32,768 tokens. Muse Spark 1.1 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is limited to 32,768 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Muse Spark 1.1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas K-EXAONE-236B-A23B does not.
Muse Spark 1.1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
Muse Spark 1.1
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B was released on 2025-12-31, while Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09.
Muse Spark 1.1 is 6 months newer than K-EXAONE-236B-A23B.
Dec 31, 2025
6 months ago
Jul 9, 2026
1 weeks ago
6mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-10-01, while Muse Spark 1.1's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm K-EXAONE-236B-A23B's training data extends to 2025-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Spark 1.1's cutoff date.
Oct 2025
—
Provider Availability
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is available from FriendliAI. Muse Spark 1.1 is available from Meta Model API.
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
Muse Spark 1.1
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
View detailsLG AI Research
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs Muse Spark 1.1.