Model Comparison

Kimi-k1.5 vs o4-mini

o4-mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Kimi-k1.5 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while o4-mini is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, MathVista, MMMU).

o4-mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri May 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o4-mini specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only o4-mini specifies output context (100,000 tokens).

Moonshot AI
Kimi-k1.5
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
o4-mini
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Fri May 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Kimi-k1.5 and o4-mini support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Kimi-k1.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o4-mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Kimi-k1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

o4-mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi-k1.5 was released on 2025-01-20, while o4-mini was released on 2025-04-16.

o4-mini is 3 months newer than Kimi-k1.5.

Kimi-k1.5

Jan 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

o4-mini

Apr 16, 2025

1.1 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o4-mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while Kimi-k1.5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o4-mini's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Kimi-k1.5's cutoff date.

Kimi-k1.5

o4-mini

May 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher AIME 2024 score (93.4% vs 77.5%)
Higher MathVista score (84.3% vs 74.9%)
Higher MMMU score (81.6% vs 70.0%)
Moonshot AIKimi-k1.5
OpenAIo4-mini

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Moonshot AI
Kimi-k1.5
OpenAI
o4-mini

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi-k1.5 vs o4-mini.

Which is better, Kimi-k1.5 or o4-mini?

o4-mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Kimi-k1.5 is made by Moonshot AI and o4-mini is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Kimi-k1.5 compare to o4-mini in benchmarks?

Kimi-k1.5 scores MATH-500: 96.2%, CLUEWSC: 91.4%, C-Eval: 88.3%, MMLU: 87.4%, IFEval: 87.2%. o4-mini scores AIME 2024: 93.4%, AIME 2025: 92.7%, MathVista: 84.3%, MMMU: 81.6%, GPQA: 81.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Kimi-k1.5 and o4-mini?

Kimi-k1.5 supports an unknown number of tokens and o4-mini supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes Kimi-k1.5 and o4-mini?

Kimi-k1.5 is developed by Moonshot AI and o4-mini is developed by OpenAI.