The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Kimi K2 0905 vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.3 to 21.8. Muse Spark 1.3 is 8.6x cheaper per token.

Moonshot AI · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.3 to 21.8, ranking #5 overall.

On price, Muse Spark 1.3 is roughly 8.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Spark 1.3 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Kimi K2 0905

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.60/M input and $2.50/M output

Choose Muse Spark 1.3

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.3 and ranks #5 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • cost matters — it's about 8.6x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
21.8
#173
55.3
#5
22.2
#162
52.8
#7
19.5
#98
41.7
#10
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.60 / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
$2.50 / M
$0.20 / M
Context window
262,144
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Kimi K2 0905 · 11 for Muse Spark 1.3

No common benchmarks found

Kimi K2 0905 and Muse Spark 1.3don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Muse Spark 1.3 costs less

For input processing, Kimi K2 0905 ($0.60/1M tokens) is 6.0x more expensive than Muse Spark 1.3 ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Kimi K2 0905 ($2.50/1M tokens) is 12.5x more expensive than Muse Spark 1.3 ($0.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Kimi K2 0905 is more expensive than Muse Spark 1.3.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 0905
Input tokens$0.60
Output tokens$2.50
Best providerNovita
Meta
Muse Spark 1.3
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Spark 1.3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Kimi K2 0905's 262,144 tokens. Muse Spark 1.3 can generate longer responses up to 943,718 tokens, while Kimi K2 0905 is limited to 262,144 tokens.

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 0905
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output943,718 tokens
Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Spark 1.3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Kimi K2 0905 does not.

Muse Spark 1.3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Kimi K2 0905

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Kimi K2 0905

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Spark 1.3

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K2 0905 was released on 2025-09-05, while Muse Spark 1.3 was released on 2026-09-02.

Muse Spark 1.3 is 12 months newer than Kimi K2 0905.

Kimi K2 0905

Sep 5, 2025

12 months ago

Muse Spark 1.3

Sep 2, 2026

2 days ago

12mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Kimi K2 0905 is available from Novita. Muse Spark 1.3 is available from Meta Model API.

Kimi K2 0905

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M

Muse Spark 1.3

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Kimi K2 0905 and Muse Spark 1.3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Kimi K2 0905
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K2 0905 vs Muse Spark 1.3.

Which is better, Kimi K2 0905 or Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.3 to 21.8. Kimi K2 0905 is made by Moonshot AI and Muse Spark 1.3 is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Kimi K2 0905 compare to Muse Spark 1.3 in benchmarks?

Kimi K2 0905 scores HumanEval: 94.5%, MMLU: 90.2%, MATH: 89.1%, MMLU-Pro: 82.5%, GPQA: 75.8%. Muse Spark 1.3 scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 98.5%, MRCR v2 (8-needle, 512K-1M): 98.1%, DeepSearchQA: 89.4%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.8%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.4%.

Is Kimi K2 0905 cheaper than Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is 6.0x cheaper for input tokens. Kimi K2 0905 costs $0.60/M input and $2.50/M output via novita. Muse Spark 1.3 costs $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for Kimi K2 0905 and Muse Spark 1.3?

Kimi K2 0905 supports 262K tokens and Muse Spark 1.3 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Kimi K2 0905 and Muse Spark 1.3?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (21.8 vs 55.3), context window (262K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.60 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Kimi K2 0905 and Muse Spark 1.3?

Kimi K2 0905 is developed by Moonshot AI and Muse Spark 1.3 is developed by Meta.