Model Comparison

Kimi K2 0905 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Kimi K2 0905 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is 3.0x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Kimi K2 0905 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Kimi K2 0905 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Kimi K2 0905 ($0.60/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.35/1M tokens).

For output processing, Kimi K2 0905 ($2.50/1M tokens) is 6.3x more expensive than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Kimi K2 0905 is more expensive than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 0905
Input tokens$0.60
Output tokens$2.50
Best providerNovita
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input tokens$0.35
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

927.3B diff

Kimi K2 0905 has 927.3B more parameters than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct, making it 1275.5% larger.

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 0905
1000.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
72.7Bparameters
1000.0B
Kimi K2 0905
72.7B
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Kimi K2 0905 accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's 131,072 tokens. Kimi K2 0905 can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 0905
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Kimi K2 0905 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct uses Qwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Kimi K2 0905

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Qwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K2 0905 was released on 2025-09-05, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Kimi K2 0905 is 12 months newer than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.

Kimi K2 0905

Sep 5, 2025

7 months ago

11mo newer
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Kimi K2 0905 is available from Novita. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks, Together.

Kimi K2 0905

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.35/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Moonshot AI
Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (75.8% vs 49.0%)
Higher HumanEval score (94.5% vs 86.6%)
Higher MATH score (89.1% vs 83.1%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (82.5% vs 71.1%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 0905
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K2 0905 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Kimi K2 0905 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Kimi K2 0905 is made by Moonshot AI and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Kimi K2 0905 scores HumanEval: 94.5%, MMLU: 90.2%, MATH: 89.1%, MMLU-Pro: 82.5%, GPQA: 75.8%. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.8%, MT-Bench: 93.5%, MBPP: 88.2%, MMLU-Redux: 86.8%, HumanEval: 86.6%.
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is 1.7x cheaper for input tokens. Kimi K2 0905 costs $0.60/M input and $2.50/M output via novita. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.35/M input and $0.40/M output via deepinfra.
Kimi K2 0905 supports 262K tokens and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (262K vs 131K), input pricing ($0.60 vs $0.35/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Qwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Kimi K2 0905 is developed by Moonshot AI and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.