Model Comparison

Kimi K2 0905 vs Qwen3 MaxWhich is better in 2026?

Kimi K2 0905 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Kimi K2 0905 is 1.5x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Kimi K2 0905 vs Qwen3 Max — which is better?

Kimi K2 0905 (by Moonshot AI) and Qwen3 Max (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Kimi K2 0905 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen3 Max is better at 0 benchmarks. Kimi K2 0905 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Kimi K2 0905 is roughly 1.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Kimi K2 0905 also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Kimi K2 0905 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 1.5x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window

Choose Qwen3 Max if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Kimi K2 0905 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen3 Max is better at 0 benchmarks.

Kimi K2 0905 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Jul 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Kimi K2 0905 costs less

For input processing, Kimi K2 0905 ($0.60/1M tokens) is 1.2x more expensive than Qwen3 Max ($0.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, Kimi K2 0905 ($2.50/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than Qwen3 Max ($5.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 Max is more expensive than Kimi K2 0905.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Jul 27 2026 • llm-stats.com
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 0905
Input tokens$0.60
Output tokens$2.50
Best providerNovita
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 Max
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$5.00
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

0.0M diff

Qwen3 Max has 0.0B more parameters than Kimi K2 0905, making it 0.0% larger.

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 0905
1.0Tparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 Max
1.0Tparameters
1000.0B
Kimi K2 0905
1000.0B
Qwen3 Max

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Kimi K2 0905 accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Qwen3 Max's 256,000 tokens. Kimi K2 0905 can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Qwen3 Max is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 0905
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 Max
Input256,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Jul 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Kimi K2 0905

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 Max

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K2 0905 was released on 2025-09-05, while Qwen3 Max was released on 2025-12-15.

Qwen3 Max is 3 months newer than Kimi K2 0905.

Kimi K2 0905

Sep 5, 2025

10 months ago

Qwen3 Max

Dec 15, 2025

7 months ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Kimi K2 0905 is available from Novita. Qwen3 Max is available from Novita.

Kimi K2 0905

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M

Qwen3 Max

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GPQA score (75.8% vs 62.0%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 Max

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Kimi K2 0905 and Qwen3 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Kimi K2 0905
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 Max
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 0905
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 Max

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K2 0905 vs Qwen3 Max.

Which is better, Kimi K2 0905 or Qwen3 Max?

Kimi K2 0905 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Kimi K2 0905 is made by Moonshot AI and Qwen3 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Kimi K2 0905 compare to Qwen3 Max in benchmarks?

Kimi K2 0905 scores HumanEval: 94.5%, MMLU: 90.2%, MATH: 89.1%, MMLU-Pro: 82.5%, GPQA: 75.8%. Qwen3 Max scores AIME 2025: 81.6%, t2-bench: 74.8%, SWE-Bench Verified: 69.6%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.0%, SuperGPQA: 65.1%.

Is Kimi K2 0905 cheaper than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is 1.2x cheaper for input tokens. Kimi K2 0905 costs $0.60/M input and $2.50/M output via novita. Qwen3 Max costs $0.50/M input and $5.00/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Kimi K2 0905 and Qwen3 Max?

Kimi K2 0905 supports 262K tokens and Qwen3 Max supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Kimi K2 0905 and Qwen3 Max?

Key differences include context window (262K vs 256K), input pricing ($0.60 vs $0.50/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Kimi K2 0905 and Qwen3 Max?

Kimi K2 0905 is developed by Moonshot AI and Qwen3 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.