Model Comparison

Kimi K2 Base vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Kimi K2 Base significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Kimi K2 Base outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GSM8k, MATH, MMLU, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Kimi K2 Base significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Base
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input tokens$0.09
Output tokens$0.09
Best providerLambda
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

968.0B diff

Kimi K2 Base has 968.0B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct, making it 3025.0% larger.

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Base
1000.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
32.0Bparameters
1000.0B
Kimi K2 Base
32.0B
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Base
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Kimi K2 Base is licensed under MIT, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Kimi K2 Base

MIT

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K2 Base was released on 2025-07-11, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Kimi K2 Base is 10 months newer than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.

Kimi K2 Base

Jul 11, 2025

9 months ago

9mo newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher GSM8k score (92.1% vs 91.1%)
Higher MATH score (70.2% vs 57.2%)
Higher MMLU score (87.8% vs 75.1%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (69.2% vs 50.4%)
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Base
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K2 Base vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Kimi K2 Base significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Kimi K2 Base is made by Moonshot AI and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Kimi K2 Base scores C-Eval: 92.5%, GSM8k: 92.1%, MMLU-redux-2.0: 90.2%, MMLU: 87.8%, TriviaQA: 85.1%. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct scores HumanEval: 92.7%, GSM8k: 91.1%, MBPP: 90.2%, HellaSwag: 83.0%, Winogrande: 80.8%.
Kimi K2 Base supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Kimi K2 Base is developed by Moonshot AI and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.