Model Comparison
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 vs DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek-R1-0528 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench), while DeepSeek-R1-0528 is better at 10 benchmarks (Aider-Polyglot, AIME 2024, AIME 2025, GPQA, HMMT 2025, Humanity's Last Exam, LiveCodeBench, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-Redux, SimpleQA).
DeepSeek-R1-0528 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 has 329.0B more parameters than DeepSeek-R1-0528, making it 49.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only DeepSeek-R1-0528 specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only DeepSeek-R1-0528 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under MIT.
Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.
MIT
Open weights
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 was released on 2025-09-05, while DeepSeek-R1-0528 was released on 2025-05-28.
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 is 3 months newer than DeepSeek-R1-0528.
Sep 5, 2025
6 months ago
3mo newerMay 28, 2025
10 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
View detailsMoonshot AI
DeepSeek-R1-0528
View detailsDeepSeek
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 vs DeepSeek-R1-0528