Model Comparison

Kimi K2.5 vs GPT-5.2 Pro

GPT-5.2 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Kimi K2.5 is 53.7x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Kimi K2.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while GPT-5.2 Pro is better at 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, BrowseComp, GPQA, HMMT 2025).

GPT-5.2 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Apr 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Kimi K2.5 costs less

For input processing, Kimi K2.5 ($0.60/1M tokens) is 35.0x cheaper than GPT-5.2 Pro ($21.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Kimi K2.5 ($2.50/1M tokens) is 67.2x cheaper than GPT-5.2 Pro ($168.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-5.2 Pro is more expensive than Kimi K2.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 10 2026 • llm-stats.com
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.5
Input tokens$0.60
Output tokens$2.50
Best providerFireworks
OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro
Input tokens$21.00
Output tokens$168.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-5.2 Pro accepts 400,000 input tokens compared to Kimi K2.5's 262,100 tokens. Kimi K2.5 can generate longer responses up to 262,100 tokens, while GPT-5.2 Pro is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.5
Input262,100 tokens
Output262,100 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Fri Apr 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Kimi K2.5 and GPT-5.2 Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Kimi K2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-5.2 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Kimi K2.5 is licensed under MIT, while GPT-5.2 Pro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Kimi K2.5

MIT

Open weights

GPT-5.2 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K2.5 was released on 2026-01-27, while GPT-5.2 Pro was released on 2025-12-11.

Kimi K2.5 is 2 months newer than GPT-5.2 Pro.

Kimi K2.5

Jan 27, 2026

2 months ago

1mo newer
GPT-5.2 Pro

Dec 11, 2025

4 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Kimi K2.5 is available from Fireworks. GPT-5.2 Pro is available from OpenAI.

Kimi K2.5

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M

GPT-5.2 Pro

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $21.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $168.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (50.2% vs 36.6%)
Larger context window (400,000 tokens)
Higher AIME 2025 score (100.0% vs 96.1%)
Higher BrowseComp score (77.9% vs 74.9%)
Higher GPQA score (93.2% vs 87.6%)
Higher HMMT 2025 score (100.0% vs 95.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.5
OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K2.5 vs GPT-5.2 Pro

GPT-5.2 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Kimi K2.5 is made by Moonshot AI and GPT-5.2 Pro is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Kimi K2.5 scores AIME 2025: 96.1%, HMMT 2025: 95.4%, InfoVQAtest: 92.6%, OCRBench: 92.3%, MathVista-Mini: 90.1%. GPT-5.2 Pro scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, HMMT 2025: 100.0%, GPQA: 93.2%, ARC-AGI: 90.5%, BrowseComp: 77.9%.
Kimi K2.5 is 35.0x cheaper for input tokens. Kimi K2.5 costs $0.60/M input and $2.50/M output via fireworks. GPT-5.2 Pro costs $21.00/M input and $168.00/M output via openai.
Kimi K2.5 supports 262K tokens and GPT-5.2 Pro supports 400K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (262K vs 400K), input pricing ($0.60 vs $21.00/M), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Kimi K2.5 is developed by Moonshot AI and GPT-5.2 Pro is developed by OpenAI.