Model Comparison

Kimi K2.5 vs Grok Imagine Image Pro

Comparing Kimi K2.5 and Grok Imagine Image Pro across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Kimi K2.5 and Grok Imagine Image Pro don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Apr 18 2026 • llm-stats.com
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.5
Input tokens$0.60
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerFireworks
xAI
Grok Imagine Image Pro
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Kimi K2.5 accepts 262,100 input tokens compared to Grok Imagine Image Pro's 131,072 tokens. Only Kimi K2.5 specifies output context (262,100 tokens).

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.5
Input262,100 tokens
Output262,100 tokens
xAI
Grok Imagine Image Pro
Input131,072 tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Apr 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Kimi K2.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Grok Imagine Image Pro does not.

Kimi K2.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Kimi K2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok Imagine Image Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Kimi K2.5 is licensed under MIT, while Grok Imagine Image Pro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Kimi K2.5

MIT

Open weights

Grok Imagine Image Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K2.5 was released on 2026-01-27, while Grok Imagine Image Pro was released on 2026-02-01.

Grok Imagine Image Pro is 0 month newer than Kimi K2.5.

Kimi K2.5

Jan 27, 2026

2 months ago

Grok Imagine Image Pro

Feb 1, 2026

2 months ago

5d newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Kimi K2.5 is available from Fireworks, Moonshot AI. Grok Imagine Image Pro is available from xAI.

Kimi K2.5

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
moonshot logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M

Grok Imagine Image Pro

xai logo
xAI
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Moonshot AI
Larger context window (262,100 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Has open weights
xAI

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.5
xAI
Grok Imagine Image Pro

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K2.5 vs Grok Imagine Image Pro

Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot AI) and Grok Imagine Image Pro (xAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
Kimi K2.5 scores AIME 2025: 96.1%, HMMT 2025: 95.4%, InfoVQAtest: 92.6%, OCRBench: 92.3%, MathVista-Mini: 90.1%.
Kimi K2.5 supports 262K tokens and Grok Imagine Image Pro supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (262K vs 131K), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Kimi K2.5 is developed by Moonshot AI and Grok Imagine Image Pro is developed by xAI.