Model Comparison

Kimi K2.5 vs MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2-Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Kimi K2.5 is 1.4x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Kimi K2.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (SWE-bench Multilingual), while MiMo-V2-Pro is better at 3 benchmarks (DeepSearchQA, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0).

MiMo-V2-Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Apr 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Kimi K2.5 costs less

For input processing, Kimi K2.5 ($0.60/1M tokens) is 1.7x cheaper than MiMo-V2-Pro ($1.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Kimi K2.5 ($2.50/1M tokens) is 1.2x cheaper than MiMo-V2-Pro ($3.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, MiMo-V2-Pro is more expensive than Kimi K2.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 03 2026 • llm-stats.com
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.5
Input tokens$0.60
Output tokens$2.50
Best providerFireworks
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

0.0M diff

MiMo-V2-Pro has 0.0B more parameters than Kimi K2.5, making it 0.0% larger.

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.5
1000.0Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro
1000.0Bparameters
1000.0B
Kimi K2.5
1000.0B
MiMo-V2-Pro

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2-Pro accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Kimi K2.5's 262,100 tokens. Kimi K2.5 can generate longer responses up to 262,100 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Pro is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.5
Input262,100 tokens
Output262,100 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Fri Apr 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Kimi K2.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Pro does not.

Kimi K2.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Kimi K2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Kimi K2.5 is licensed under MIT, while MiMo-V2-Pro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Kimi K2.5

MIT

Open weights

MiMo-V2-Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K2.5 was released on 2026-01-27, while MiMo-V2-Pro was released on 2026-03-18.

MiMo-V2-Pro is 2 months newer than Kimi K2.5.

Kimi K2.5

Jan 27, 2026

2 months ago

MiMo-V2-Pro

Mar 18, 2026

2 weeks ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Kimi K2.5 is available from Fireworks. MiMo-V2-Pro is available from Xiaomi.

Kimi K2.5

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M

MiMo-V2-Pro

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Moonshot AI
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher SWE-bench Multilingual score (73.0% vs 71.7%)
Xiaomi
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Higher DeepSearchQA score (86.7% vs 77.1%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (78.0% vs 76.8%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (57.1% vs 50.8%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.5
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K2.5 vs MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2-Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Kimi K2.5 is made by Moonshot AI and MiMo-V2-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Kimi K2.5 scores AIME 2025: 96.1%, HMMT 2025: 95.4%, InfoVQAtest: 92.6%, OCRBench: 92.3%, MathVista-Mini: 90.1%. MiMo-V2-Pro scores Tau2 Telecom: 96.8%, DeepSearchQA: 86.7%, PinchBench: 81.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 78.0%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 71.7%.
Kimi K2.5 is 1.7x cheaper for input tokens. Kimi K2.5 costs $0.60/M input and $2.50/M output via fireworks. MiMo-V2-Pro costs $1.00/M input and $3.00/M output via xiaomi.
Kimi K2.5 supports 262K tokens and MiMo-V2-Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (262K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.60 vs $1.00/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Kimi K2.5 is developed by Moonshot AI and MiMo-V2-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.