Model Comparison

Kimi K2.5 vs Nova Lite

Kimi K2.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Nova Lite is 10.2x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Kimi K2.5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LVBench), while Nova Lite is better at 0 benchmarks.

Kimi K2.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nova Lite costs less

For input processing, Kimi K2.5 ($0.60/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than Nova Lite ($0.06/1M tokens).

For output processing, Kimi K2.5 ($2.50/1M tokens) is 10.4x more expensive than Nova Lite ($0.24/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Kimi K2.5 is more expensive than Nova Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.5
Input tokens$0.60
Output tokens$2.50
Best providerFireworks
Amazon
Nova Lite
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.24
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Nova Lite accepts 300,000 input tokens compared to Kimi K2.5's 262,100 tokens. Kimi K2.5 can generate longer responses up to 262,100 tokens, while Nova Lite is limited to 2,048 tokens.

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.5
Input262,100 tokens
Output262,100 tokens
Amazon
Nova Lite
Input300,000 tokens
Output2,048 tokens
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Kimi K2.5 and Nova Lite support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Kimi K2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Kimi K2.5 is licensed under MIT, while Nova Lite uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Kimi K2.5

MIT

Open weights

Nova Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K2.5 was released on 2026-01-27, while Nova Lite was released on 2024-11-20.

Kimi K2.5 is 14 months newer than Nova Lite.

Kimi K2.5

Jan 27, 2026

2 months ago

1.2yr newer
Nova Lite

Nov 20, 2024

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Kimi K2.5 is available from Fireworks. Nova Lite is available from Bedrock.

Kimi K2.5

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M

Nova Lite

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.24/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Moonshot AI
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (87.6% vs 42.0%)
Higher LVBench score (75.9% vs 40.4%)
Amazon
Larger context window (300,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.5
Amazon
Nova Lite

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K2.5 vs Nova Lite

Kimi K2.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Kimi K2.5 is made by Moonshot AI and Nova Lite is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Kimi K2.5 scores AIME 2025: 96.1%, HMMT 2025: 95.4%, InfoVQAtest: 92.6%, OCRBench: 92.3%, MathVista-Mini: 90.1%. Nova Lite scores GSM8k: 94.5%, ARC-C: 92.4%, DocVQA: 92.4%, IFEval: 89.7%, Translation en→Set1 COMET22: 88.8%.
Nova Lite is 10.0x cheaper for input tokens. Kimi K2.5 costs $0.60/M input and $2.50/M output via fireworks. Nova Lite costs $0.06/M input and $0.24/M output via bedrock.
Kimi K2.5 supports 262K tokens and Nova Lite supports 300K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (262K vs 300K), input pricing ($0.60 vs $0.06/M), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Kimi K2.5 is developed by Moonshot AI and Nova Lite is developed by Amazon.