Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3.5-27B Comparison
Comparing Kimi K2.5 and Qwen3.5-27B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Kimi K2.5 outperforms in 20 benchmarks (AA-LCR, BrowseComp, GPQA, HMMT 2025, Humanity's Last Exam, LiveCodeBench v6, LongBench v2, LVBench, MathVista-Mini, MMLU-Pro, MMMU-Pro, MMVU, OCRBench, Seal-0, SimpleVQA, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0, VideoMMMU, WideSearch, ZEROBench), while Qwen3.5-27B is better at 3 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, MathVision, OmniDocBench 1.5).
Kimi K2.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Kimi K2.5 has 973.0B more parameters than Qwen3.5-27B, making it 3603.7% larger.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Kimi K2.5 and Qwen3.5-27B support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Kimi K2.5
Qwen3.5-27B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Kimi K2.5 is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3.5-27B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Kimi K2.5 was released on 2026-01-27, while Qwen3.5-27B was released on 2026-02-24.
Qwen3.5-27B is 1 month newer than Kimi K2.5.
Jan 27, 2026
1 months ago
Feb 24, 2026
3 weeks ago
4w newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Kimi K2.5
View detailsMoonshot AI
Qwen3.5-27B
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|