Model Comparison
Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?
Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is 12.3x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking — which is better?
Kimi K3 (by Moonshot AI) and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Kimi K3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks. Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is roughly 12.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Kimi K3 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Kimi K3 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026
Choose Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking if…
- cost matters — it's about 12.3x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Kimi K3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks.
Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Kimi K3 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 20.0x more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking ($0.15/1M tokens).
For output processing, Kimi K3 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking ($1.50/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Kimi K3 is more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Kimi K3 has 2720.0B more parameters than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking, making it 3400.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Kimi K3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking's 65,536 tokens. Kimi K3 can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is limited to 65,536 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Kimi K3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking does not.
Kimi K3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Kimi K3
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Kimi K3 was released on 2026-07-16, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking was released on 2025-09-10.
Kimi K3 is 10 months newer than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.
Jul 16, 2026
5 days ago
10mo newerSep 10, 2025
10 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Kimi K3 is available from Moonshot AI. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is available from Novita.
Kimi K3
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Kimi K3
View detailsMoonshot AI
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Kimi K3 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.