Model Comparison
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs QwQ-32B-PreviewWhich is better in 2026?
QwQ-32B-Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. QwQ-32B-Preview is 5.5x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs QwQ-32B-Preview — which is better?
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct (by Meta) and QwQ-32B-Preview (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while QwQ-32B-Preview is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). QwQ-32B-Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, QwQ-32B-Preview is roughly 5.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct also accepts a larger context window (128,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Llama 3.1 405B Instruct if…
- you process long inputs — it offers a 128,000 token context window
Choose QwQ-32B-Preview if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
- cost matters — it's about 5.5x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2024
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while QwQ-32B-Preview is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).
QwQ-32B-Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct ($0.89/1M tokens) is 5.9x more expensive than QwQ-32B-Preview ($0.15/1M tokens).
For output processing, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct ($0.89/1M tokens) is 4.5x more expensive than QwQ-32B-Preview ($0.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is more expensive than QwQ-32B-Preview.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has 372.5B more parameters than QwQ-32B-Preview, making it 1146.2% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct accepts 128,000 input tokens compared to QwQ-32B-Preview's 32,768 tokens. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while QwQ-32B-Preview is limited to 32,768 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.1 Community License, while QwQ-32B-Preview uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Llama 3.1 Community License
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct was released on 2024-07-23, while QwQ-32B-Preview was released on 2024-11-28.
QwQ-32B-Preview is 4 months newer than Llama 3.1 405B Instruct.
Jul 23, 2024
1.9 years ago
Nov 28, 2024
1.5 years ago
4mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
QwQ-32B-Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while Llama 3.1 405B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm QwQ-32B-Preview's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Llama 3.1 405B Instruct's cutoff date.
—
Nov 2024
Provider Availability
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is available from Lambda, DeepInfra, Fireworks, Bedrock, Together, Hyperbolic, Google, Replicate. QwQ-32B-Preview is available from DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks, Together.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
QwQ-32B-Preview
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
QwQ-32B-Preview
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs QwQ-32B-Preview.