Model Comparison

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Nova Pro

Nova Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is 46.7x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct outperforms in 1 benchmarks (BFCL), while Nova Pro is better at 6 benchmarks (ARC-C, DROP, GPQA, HumanEval, IFEval, MMLU).

Nova Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct ($0.03/1M tokens) is 26.7x cheaper than Nova Pro ($0.80/1M tokens).

For output processing, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct ($0.03/1M tokens) is 106.7x cheaper than Nova Pro ($3.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Nova Pro is more expensive than Llama 3.1 8B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meta
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Input tokens$0.03
Output tokens$0.03
Best providerLambda
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Nova Pro accepts 300,000 input tokens compared to Llama 3.1 8B Instruct's 131,072 tokens. Nova Pro can generate longer responses up to 300,000 tokens, while Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Meta
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input300,000 tokens
Output300,000 tokens
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Nova Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.1 8B Instruct does not.

Nova Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.1 Community License, while Nova Pro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Nova Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct was released on 2024-07-23, while Nova Pro was released on 2024-11-20.

Nova Pro is 4 months newer than Llama 3.1 8B Instruct.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Jul 23, 2024

1.7 years ago

Nova Pro

Nov 20, 2024

1.4 years ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Nova Pro's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 8B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Nova Pro's cutoff date.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Dec 2023

Nova Pro

—

Provider Availability

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is available from Lambda, DeepInfra, Groq, Sambanova, Cerebras, Hyperbolic, Together, Fireworks, Bedrock. Nova Pro is available from Bedrock.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

lambda logo
Lambda
Input Price:Input: $0.03/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.03/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.05/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.05/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.05/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.08/1M
sambanova logo
Sambanova
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
cerebras logo
Cerebras
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.10/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.10/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.22/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.22/1M

Nova Pro

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Meta
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher BFCL score (76.1% vs 68.4%)
Amazon
Larger context window (300,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher ARC-C score (94.8% vs 83.4%)
Higher DROP score (85.4% vs 59.5%)
Higher GPQA score (46.9% vs 30.4%)
Higher HumanEval score (89.0% vs 72.6%)
Higher IFEval score (92.1% vs 80.4%)
Higher MMLU score (85.9% vs 69.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Meta
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Amazon
Nova Pro

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Nova Pro

Nova Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is made by Meta and Nova Pro is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct scores GSM-8K (CoT): 84.5%, ARC-C: 83.4%, API-Bank: 82.6%, IFEval: 80.4%, BFCL: 76.1%. Nova Pro scores ARC-C: 94.8%, GSM8k: 94.8%, DocVQA: 93.5%, IFEval: 92.1%, ChartQA: 89.2%.
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is 26.7x cheaper for input tokens. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs $0.03/M input and $0.03/M output via lambda. Nova Pro costs $0.80/M input and $3.20/M output via bedrock.
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct supports 131K tokens and Nova Pro supports 300K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (131K vs 300K), input pricing ($0.03 vs $0.80/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Llama 3.1 Community License vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is developed by Meta and Nova Pro is developed by Amazon.