Model Comparison

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.1Which is better in 2026?

Comparing Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.1 — which is better?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct (by NVIDIA) and Muse Spark 1.1 (by Meta) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Spark 1.1 if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Spark 1.1 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Muse Spark 1.1 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Wed Jul 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Muse Spark 1.1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not.

Muse Spark 1.1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.1 Community License, while Muse Spark 1.1 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct was released on 2024-10-01, while Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09.

Muse Spark 1.1 is 22 months newer than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Oct 1, 2024

1.8 years ago

Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.8yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-01, while Muse Spark 1.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Spark 1.1's cutoff date.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Dec 2023

Muse Spark 1.1

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

NVIDIA
Has open weights
Meta
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.1
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.1.

Which is better, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct or Muse Spark 1.1?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct (NVIDIA) and Muse Spark 1.1 (Meta) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct compare to Muse Spark 1.1 in benchmarks?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.4%, HellaSwag: 85.6%, Winogrande: 84.5%, GSM8K Chat: 81.9%, MMLU Chat: 80.6%. Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Llama 3.1 Community License vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is developed by NVIDIA and Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons