The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

NVIDIA · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU). Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the NVIDIA ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
Released
Oct 2024
Sep 2025
License
Llama 3.1 Community License
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU).

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

37.0B diff

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has 37.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking, making it 112.1% larger.

NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
70.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
33.0Bparameters
70.0B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.1 Community License, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct was released on 2024-10-01, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is 12 months newer than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Oct 1, 2024

1.9 years ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

11 months ago

11mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-01, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking's cutoff date.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Dec 2023

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking.

Which is better, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is made by NVIDIA and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking in benchmarks?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.4%, HellaSwag: 85.6%, Winogrande: 84.5%, GSM8K Chat: 81.9%, MMLU Chat: 80.6%. Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 96.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.7%, MMLU-Redux: 91.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 90.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.2%.

What are the main differences between Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Llama 3.1 Community License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is developed by NVIDIA and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.