Model Comparison

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU).

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers

Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Input tokens$0.00

Output tokens$0.00

Best providerUnknown Organization

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Input tokens$0.08

Output tokens$0.50

Best providerNovita

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

61.0B diff

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has 61.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct, making it 677.8% larger.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

70.0Bparameters

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

9.0Bparameters

70.0B

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

9.0B

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Input- tokens

Output- tokens

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Input131,072 tokens

Output32,768 tokens

Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not.

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.1 Community License, while Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct was released on 2024-10-01, while Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct is 12 months newer than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Oct 1, 2024

1.6 years ago

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

7 months ago

11mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-01, while Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct's cutoff date.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Dec 2023

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

View details

NVIDIA

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)

Supports multimodal inputs

Higher MMLU score (80.7% vs 80.2%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct	Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is made by NVIDIA and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.4%, HellaSwag: 85.6%, Winogrande: 84.5%, GSM8K Chat: 81.9%, MMLU Chat: 80.6%. Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.1%, ScreenSpot: 94.4%, OCRBench: 89.6%, AI2D: 85.7%, MMBench-V1.1: 85.0%.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Llama 3.1 Community License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is developed by NVIDIA and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Performance Benchmarks

Arena Performance

Pricing Analysis

Model Size

Context Window

Input Capabilities

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

License

Release Timeline

Knowledge Cutoff

Outputs Comparison

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Detailed Comparison

FAQ

Which is better, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct or Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct?

How does Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct compare to Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct in benchmarks?

What are the context window sizes for Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct?

What are the main differences between Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct?

Who makes Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct?