Model Comparison

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (LiveCodeBench), while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers

Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Input tokens$0.00

Output tokens$0.00

Best providerUnknown Organization

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Input tokens$0.09

Output tokens$0.09

Best providerLambda

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

221.0B diff

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has 221.0B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct, making it 690.6% larger.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

253.0Bparameters

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

32.0Bparameters

253.0B

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

32.0B

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Input- tokens

Output- tokens

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Input128,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is licensed under Llama 3.1 Community License, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 was released on 2025-04-07, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is 7 months newer than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Apr 7, 2025

1.0 years ago

6mo newer

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-01, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1's training data extends to 2023-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct's cutoff date.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Dec 2023

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

View details

NVIDIA

Higher LiveCodeBench score (66.3% vs 31.4%)

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1	Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is made by NVIDIA and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 scores MATH-500: 97.0%, IFEval: 89.5%, GPQA: 76.0%, BFCL v2: 74.1%, AIME 2025: 72.5%. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct scores HumanEval: 92.7%, GSM8k: 91.1%, MBPP: 90.2%, HellaSwag: 83.0%, Winogrande: 80.8%.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Key differences include licensing (Llama 3.1 Community License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is developed by NVIDIA and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Performance Benchmarks

Arena Performance

Pricing Analysis

Model Size

Context Window

License

Release Timeline

Knowledge Cutoff

Outputs Comparison

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Detailed Comparison

FAQ

Which is better, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

How does Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 compare to Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

What are the context window sizes for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

What are the main differences between Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

Who makes Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?