The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

NVIDIA · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, IFEval), while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2025). Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
2 of 3
1 of 3
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
Released
Apr 2025
Sep 2025
License
Llama 3.1 Community License
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, IFEval), while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2025).

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

220.0B diff

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has 220.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking, making it 666.7% larger.

NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
253.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
33.0Bparameters
253.0B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 does not.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is licensed under Llama 3.1 Community License, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 was released on 2025-04-07, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is 6 months newer than Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Apr 7, 2025

1.4 years ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

11 months ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-01, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1's training data extends to 2023-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking's cutoff date.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Dec 2023

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking.

Which is better, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is made by NVIDIA and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking in benchmarks?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 scores MATH-500: 97.0%, IFEval: 89.5%, GPQA: 76.0%, BFCL v2: 74.1%, AIME 2025: 72.5%. Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 96.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.7%, MMLU-Redux: 91.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 90.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.2%.

What are the main differences between Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Llama 3.1 Community License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is developed by NVIDIA and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.