Model Comparison

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 32B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct — which is better?

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct (by Meta) and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MMLU). Qwen2.5 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Llama 3.2 11B Instruct if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2024

Choose Qwen2.5 32B Instruct if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MMLU).

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

21.9B diff

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 21.9B more parameters than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct, making it 206.6% larger.

Meta
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
10.6Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
32.5Bparameters
10.6B
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
32.5B
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 3.2 11B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Llama 3.2 11B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Meta
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 32B Instruct does not.

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.2 Community License, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Llama 3.2 Community License

Open weights

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is 0 month newer than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Sep 25, 2024

1.8 years ago

6d newer
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.2 11B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 32B Instruct's cutoff date.

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Dec 2023

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher GPQA score (49.5% vs 32.8%)
Higher MATH score (83.1% vs 51.9%)
Higher MMLU score (83.3% vs 73.0%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 3.2 11B Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is made by Meta and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Llama 3.2 11B Instruct compare to Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct scores AI2D: 91.1%, DocVQA: 88.4%, ChartQA: 83.4%, VQAv2 (test): 75.2%, MMLU: 73.0%. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.9%, HumanEval: 88.4%, HellaSwag: 85.2%, BBH: 84.5%, MBPP: 84.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 3.2 11B Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports 128K tokens and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 3.2 11B Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Llama 3.2 Community License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 3.2 11B Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is developed by Meta and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.