Model Comparison

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Comparing Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

476.8B diff

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct has 476.8B more parameters than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct, making it 14853.3% larger.

Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
3.2Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
480.0Bparameters
3.2B
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
480.0B
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue May 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.2 Community License, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Llama 3.2 Community License

Open weights

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct was released on 2025-01-31.

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is 4 months newer than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct.

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Sep 25, 2024

1.6 years ago

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Jan 31, 2025

1.3 years ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.

Which is better, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct or Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct (Meta) and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Llama 3.2 3B Instruct compare to Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct in benchmarks?

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct scores NIH/Multi-needle: 84.7%, ARC-C: 78.6%, GSM8k: 77.7%, IFEval: 77.4%, HellaSwag: 69.8%. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct scores TAU-bench Retail: 77.5%, SWE-Bench Verified: 69.6%, BFCL-v3: 68.7%, Aider-Polyglot: 61.8%, TAU-bench Airline: 60.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct supports 128K tokens and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Key differences include licensing (Llama 3.2 Community License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is developed by Meta and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.