Model Comparison

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 1.1x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Llama 3.2 90B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct — which is better?

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct (by Meta) and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AI2D, MMLU), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMU-Pro). Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

On price, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is roughly 1.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct also accepts a larger context window (131,072 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Llama 3.2 90B Instruct if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.35/M input and $0.40/M output

Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct if…

  • cost matters — it's about 1.1x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 131,072 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AI2D, MMLU), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMU-Pro).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Tue Jul 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Llama 3.2 90B Instruct ($0.35/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Llama 3.2 90B Instruct ($0.40/1M tokens) is 1.7x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ($0.70/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Jul 28 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Input tokens$0.35
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerDeepinfra
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$0.70
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

59.0B diff

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct has 59.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct, making it 190.3% larger.

Meta
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
90.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
31.0Bparameters
90.0B
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
31.0B
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Llama 3.2 90B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is limited to 32,768 tokens.

Meta
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Tue Jul 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Llama 3.2 90B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.2, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Llama 3.2

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 12 months newer than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct.

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Sep 25, 2024

1.8 years ago

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

10 months ago

12mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Bedrock, Fireworks, Together, Hyperbolic. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is available from Novita, DeepInfra.

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.35/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.72/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.72/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.70/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.29/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.99/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive output tokens
Higher AI2D score (92.3% vs 85.0%)
Higher MMLU score (86.0% vs 85.0%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Higher GPQA score (70.4% vs 46.7%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (60.4% vs 45.2%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 3.2 90B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.2 90B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.

Which is better, Llama 3.2 90B Instruct or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is made by Meta and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Llama 3.2 90B Instruct compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct in benchmarks?

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct scores AI2D: 92.3%, DocVQA: 90.1%, MGSM: 86.9%, MMLU: 86.0%, ChartQA: 85.5%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, OCRBench: 90.3%, MMLU-Redux: 88.4%, MMBench-V1.1: 87.0%.

Is Llama 3.2 90B Instruct cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 1.7x cheaper for input tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct costs $0.35/M input and $0.40/M output via deepinfra. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.20/M input and $0.70/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 3.2 90B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 3.2 90B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 131K), input pricing ($0.35 vs $0.20/M), licensing (Llama 3.2 vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 3.2 90B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is developed by Meta and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.