The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.4 to 13.7.

NVIDIA · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.4 to 13.7, ranking #5 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Spark 1.3

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.4 and ranks #5 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
13.7
#231
55.4
#5
13.8
#224
53.0
#6
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Context window
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 · 11 for Muse Spark 1.3

No common benchmarks found

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 and Muse Spark 1.3don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Spark 1.3 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Muse Spark 1.3 specifies output context (943,718 tokens).

NVIDIA
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output943,718 tokens
Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Spark 1.3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 does not.

Muse Spark 1.3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is licensed under Llama 3.1 Community License, while Muse Spark 1.3 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Muse Spark 1.3

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 was released on 2025-03-18, while Muse Spark 1.3 was released on 2026-09-02.

Muse Spark 1.3 is 18 months newer than Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Mar 18, 2025

1.5 years ago

Muse Spark 1.3

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Muse Spark 1.3's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Spark 1.3's cutoff date.

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Dec 2023

Muse Spark 1.3

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 and Muse Spark 1.3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Muse Spark 1.3.

Which is better, Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 or Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.4 to 13.7. Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is made by NVIDIA and Muse Spark 1.3 is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 compare to Muse Spark 1.3 in benchmarks?

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 scores MATH-500: 96.6%, MT-Bench: 91.7%, MBPP: 91.3%, Arena Hard: 88.3%, BFCL v2: 73.7%. Muse Spark 1.3 scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 98.5%, MRCR v2 (8-needle, 512K-1M): 98.1%, DeepSearchQA: 89.4%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.8%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 and Muse Spark 1.3?

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 supports an unknown number of tokens and Muse Spark 1.3 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 and Muse Spark 1.3?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (13.7 vs 55.4), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Llama 3.1 Community License vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 and Muse Spark 1.3?

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is developed by NVIDIA and Muse Spark 1.3 is developed by Meta.