Model Comparison

Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Llama 4 Maverick is 3.5x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Llama 4 Maverick outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

For input processing, Llama 4 Maverick ($0.17/1M tokens) is 1.8x cheaper than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Llama 4 Maverick ($0.60/1M tokens) is 5.0x cheaper than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 ($3.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is more expensive than Llama 4 Maverick.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Llama 4 Maverick

Input tokens$0.17

Output tokens$0.60

Best providerDeepinfra

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Input tokens$0.30

Output tokens$3.00

Best providerFireworks

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

165.0B diff

Llama 4 Maverick has 165.0B more parameters than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507, making it 70.2% larger.

Llama 4 Maverick

400.0Bparameters

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

235.0Bparameters

400.0B

Llama 4 Maverick

235.0B

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Llama 4 Maverick accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507's 262,144 tokens. Llama 4 Maverick can generate longer responses up to 1,000,000 tokens, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Llama 4 Maverick

Input1,000,000 tokens

Output1,000,000 tokens

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Input262,144 tokens

Output131,072 tokens

Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Llama 4 Maverick supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 does not.

Llama 4 Maverick can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Llama 4 Maverick

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 4 Maverick is licensed under Llama 4 Community License Agreement, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 4 Maverick was released on 2025-04-05, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 was released on 2025-07-25.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is 4 months newer than Llama 4 Maverick.

Llama 4 Maverick

Apr 5, 2025

1.1 years ago

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Jul 25, 2025

9 months ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Llama 4 Maverick is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Lambda, Groq, Fireworks, Together, Sambanova. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is available from Fireworks, Novita.

Llama 4 Maverick

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.17/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.17/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.85/1M

Lambda

Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Groq

Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.22/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.88/1M

Together

Input Price:Input: $0.27/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.85/1M

Sambanova

Input Price:Input: $0.63/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.79/1M

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Llama 4 Maverick

View details

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher GPQA score (81.1% vs 69.8%)

Higher MMLU-Pro score (84.4% vs 80.5%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Llama 4 Maverick	Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507.

Which is better, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Llama 4 Maverick is made by Meta and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Llama 4 Maverick compare to Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 in benchmarks?

Llama 4 Maverick scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 92.3%, ChartQA: 90.0%, MMLU: 85.5%, MMLU-Pro: 80.5%. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 scores MMLU-Redux: 93.8%, AIME 2025: 92.3%, WritingBench: 88.3%, IFEval: 87.8%, Creative Writing v3: 86.1%.

Is Llama 4 Maverick cheaper than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

Llama 4 Maverick is 1.8x cheaper for input tokens. Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.17/M input and $0.60/M output via deepinfra. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 costs $0.30/M input and $3.00/M output via fireworks.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

Llama 4 Maverick supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($0.17 vs $0.30/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Llama 4 Community License Agreement vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

Llama 4 Maverick is developed by Meta and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.