Model Comparison

Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Llama 4 Scout is 1.4x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Llama 4 Scout outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU-Pro), while Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Sun May 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 4 Scout costs less

For input processing, Llama 4 Scout ($0.08/1M tokens) costs the same as Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct ($0.08/1M tokens).

For output processing, Llama 4 Scout ($0.30/1M tokens) is 1.7x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct ($0.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct is more expensive than Llama 4 Scout.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun May 31 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input tokens$0.08
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerDeepinfra
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Input tokens$0.08
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

100.0B diff

Llama 4 Scout has 100.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct, making it 1111.1% larger.

Meta
Llama 4 Scout
109.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
9.0Bparameters
109.0B
Llama 4 Scout
9.0B
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Llama 4 Scout accepts 10,000,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct's 131,072 tokens. Llama 4 Scout can generate longer responses up to 10,000,000 tokens, while Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct is limited to 32,768 tokens.

Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input10,000,000 tokens
Output10,000,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Sun May 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Llama 4 Scout

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 4 Scout is licensed under Llama 4 Community License Agreement, while Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05, while Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct is 6 months newer than Llama 4 Scout.

Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

1.2 years ago

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

8 months ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Llama 4 Scout is available from DeepInfra, Lambda, Novita, Groq, Fireworks, Together. Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct is available from Novita, DeepInfra.

Llama 4 Scout

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
lambda logo
Lambda
Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.11/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.34/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.59/1M

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.69/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (10,000,000 tokens)
Less expensive output tokens
Higher MMLU-Pro score (74.3% vs 71.6%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher MMLU score (80.7% vs 79.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct.

Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Llama 4 Scout compare to Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct in benchmarks?

Llama 4 Scout scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 90.6%, ChartQA: 88.8%, MMLU: 79.6%, MMLU-Pro: 74.3%. Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.1%, ScreenSpot: 94.4%, OCRBench: 89.6%, AI2D: 85.7%, MMBench-V1.1: 85.0%.

Is Llama 4 Scout cheaper than Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct?

Both models cost $0.08 per million input tokens.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct?

Llama 4 Scout supports 10.0M tokens and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct?

Key differences include context window (10.0M vs 131K), licensing (Llama 4 Community License Agreement vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct?

Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.