The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LongCat-Flash-Chat vs Parse

Comparing LongCat-Flash-Chat and Parse across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Meituan · Cohere · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

LongCat-Flash-Chat and Parse trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

LongCat-Flash-Chat also accepts a larger context window (128,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LongCat-Flash-Chat

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 128,000 token context window
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Parse

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.20 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000
8,192

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for LongCat-Flash-Chat · 1 for Parse

No common benchmarks found

LongCat-Flash-Chat and Parsedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

557.7B diff

LongCat-Flash-Chat has 557.7B more parameters than Parse, making it 24247.8% larger.

Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Chat
560.0Bparameters
Cohere
Parse
2.3Bparameters
560.0B
LongCat-Flash-Chat
2.3B
Parse

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

LongCat-Flash-Chat accepts 128,000 input tokens compared to Parse's 8,192 tokens. Only LongCat-Flash-Chat specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Chat
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Cohere
Parse
Input8,192 tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Parse supports multimodal inputs, whereas LongCat-Flash-Chat does not.

Parse can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

LongCat-Flash-Chat

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Parse

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

LongCat-Flash-Chat is licensed under MIT, while Parse uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

LongCat-Flash-Chat

MIT

Open weights

Parse

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LongCat-Flash-Chat was released on 2025-08-29, while Parse was released on 2026-08-27.

Parse is 12 months newer than LongCat-Flash-Chat.

LongCat-Flash-Chat

Aug 29, 2025

1.0 years ago

Parse

Aug 27, 2026

4 days ago

12mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

LongCat-Flash-Chat is available from Meituan. Parse is available from Azure, Cohere.

LongCat-Flash-Chat

meituan logo
Meituan
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M

Parse

azure logo
Azure
cohere logo
Cohere
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LongCat-Flash-Chat and Parse side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LongCat-Flash-Chat
✓ Preferred
Parse
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LongCat-Flash-Chat vs Parse.

Which is better, LongCat-Flash-Chat or Parse?

LongCat-Flash-Chat (Meituan) and Parse (Cohere) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does LongCat-Flash-Chat compare to Parse in benchmarks?

LongCat-Flash-Chat scores MATH-500: 96.4%, MMLU: 89.7%, IFEval: 89.6%, ZebraLogic: 89.3%, HumanEval: 88.4%. Parse scores ParseBench: 79.2%.

What are the context window sizes for LongCat-Flash-Chat and Parse?

LongCat-Flash-Chat supports 128K tokens and Parse supports 8K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between LongCat-Flash-Chat and Parse?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 8K), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LongCat-Flash-Chat and Parse?

LongCat-Flash-Chat is developed by Meituan and Parse is developed by Cohere.