Model Comparison

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 vs Qwen3.8 MaxWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3.8 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 vs Qwen3.8 Max — which is better?

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 (by Meituan) and Qwen3.8 Max (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8 Max is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam). Qwen3.8 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Qwen3.8 Max if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8 Max is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam).

Qwen3.8 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Aug 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1840.0B diff

Qwen3.8 Max has 1840.0B more parameters than LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601, making it 328.6% larger.

Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601
560.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Max
2.4Tparameters
560.0B
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601
2400.0B
Qwen3.8 Max

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Max
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Aug 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3.8 Max supports multimodal inputs, whereas LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 does not.

Qwen3.8 Max can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8 Max

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3.8 Max uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3.8 Max

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 was released on 2026-01-14, while Qwen3.8 Max was released on 2026-08-02.

Qwen3.8 Max is 7 months newer than LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601.

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

Jan 14, 2026

6 months ago

Qwen3.8 Max

Aug 2, 2026

3 days ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Has open weights
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.8 Max

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (92.6% vs 80.5%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (43.6% vs 25.2%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 and Qwen3.8 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8 Max
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Max

FAQ

Common questions about LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 vs Qwen3.8 Max.

Which is better, LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 or Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 is made by Meituan and Qwen3.8 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 compare to Qwen3.8 Max in benchmarks?

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 scores AIME 2025: 99.6%, Tau2 Telecom: 99.3%, Tau2 Retail: 88.6%, LiveCodeBench: 82.8%, GPQA: 80.5%. Qwen3.8 Max scores PaperBench: 93.0%, GPQA: 92.6%, VideoMME w sub.: 90.4%, RealWorldQA: 88.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 86.6%.

What are the context window sizes for LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 and Qwen3.8 Max?

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 supports 128K tokens and Qwen3.8 Max supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 and Qwen3.8 Max?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 and Qwen3.8 Max?

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 is developed by Meituan and Qwen3.8 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.