Model Comparison

Magistral Small 2506 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Magistral Small 2506 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking — which is better?

Magistral Small 2506 (by Mistral AI) and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Magistral Small 2506 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA). Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Magistral Small 2506 if…

  • you are already invested in the Mistral AI ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Magistral Small 2506 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA).

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Jul 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

7.0B diff

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking has 7.0B more parameters than Magistral Small 2506, making it 29.2% larger.

Mistral AI
Magistral Small 2506
24.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
31.0Bparameters
24.0B
Magistral Small 2506
31.0B
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

Mistral AI
Magistral Small 2506
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Input131,072 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Wed Jul 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Magistral Small 2506 does not.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Magistral Small 2506

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Magistral Small 2506

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Magistral Small 2506 was released on 2025-06-10, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is 3 months newer than Magistral Small 2506.

Magistral Small 2506

Jun 10, 2025

1.1 years ago

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

10 months ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Magistral Small 2506 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-06-01, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Magistral Small 2506's training data extends to 2025-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking's cutoff date.

Magistral Small 2506

Jun 2025

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2025 score (83.1% vs 62.8%)
Higher GPQA score (74.4% vs 68.2%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Magistral Small 2506 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Magistral Small 2506
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Mistral AI
Magistral Small 2506
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Magistral Small 2506 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.

Which is better, Magistral Small 2506 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Magistral Small 2506 is made by Mistral AI and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Magistral Small 2506 compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking in benchmarks?

Magistral Small 2506 scores AIME 2024: 70.7%, GPQA: 68.2%, AIME 2025: 62.8%, LiveCodeBench: 51.3%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, MMLU-Redux: 90.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Magistral Small 2506 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Magistral Small 2506 supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Magistral Small 2506 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Magistral Small 2506 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Magistral Small 2506 is developed by Mistral AI and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.