Model Comparison

MedGemma 4B IT vs Nova Pro

Comparing MedGemma 4B IT and Nova Pro across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

MedGemma 4B IT and Nova Pro don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
MedGemma 4B IT
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Nova Pro specifies input context (300,000 tokens). Only Nova Pro specifies output context (300,000 tokens).

Google
MedGemma 4B IT
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input300,000 tokens
Output300,000 tokens
Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both MedGemma 4B IT and Nova Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MedGemma 4B IT

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MedGemma 4B IT is licensed under Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use, while Nova Pro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MedGemma 4B IT

Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use

Open weights

Nova Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MedGemma 4B IT was released on 2025-05-20, while Nova Pro was released on 2024-11-20.

MedGemma 4B IT is 6 months newer than Nova Pro.

MedGemma 4B IT

May 20, 2025

11 months ago

6mo newer
Nova Pro

Nov 20, 2024

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Has open weights
Amazon
Larger context window (300,000 tokens)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
MedGemma 4B IT
Amazon
Nova Pro

FAQ

Common questions about MedGemma 4B IT vs Nova Pro

MedGemma 4B IT (Google) and Nova Pro (Amazon) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
MedGemma 4B IT scores MIMIC CXR: 88.9%, DermMCQA: 71.8%, PathMCQA: 69.8%, SlakeVQA: 62.3%, VQA-Rad: 49.9%. Nova Pro scores ARC-C: 94.8%, GSM8k: 94.8%, DocVQA: 93.5%, IFEval: 92.1%, ChartQA: 89.2%.
MedGemma 4B IT supports an unknown number of tokens and Nova Pro supports 300K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
MedGemma 4B IT is developed by Google and Nova Pro is developed by Amazon.