Model Comparison

MedGemma 4B IT vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Comparing MedGemma 4B IT and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

MedGemma 4B IT and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
MedGemma 4B IT
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

28.7B diff

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct has 28.7B more parameters than MedGemma 4B IT, making it 667.4% larger.

Google
MedGemma 4B IT
4.3Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
33.0Bparameters
4.3B
MedGemma 4B IT
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both MedGemma 4B IT and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MedGemma 4B IT

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MedGemma 4B IT is licensed under Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MedGemma 4B IT

Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MedGemma 4B IT was released on 2025-05-20, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is 4 months newer than MedGemma 4B IT.

MedGemma 4B IT

May 20, 2025

11 months ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

7 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
MedGemma 4B IT
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about MedGemma 4B IT vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

MedGemma 4B IT (Google) and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
MedGemma 4B IT scores MIMIC CXR: 88.9%, DermMCQA: 71.8%, PathMCQA: 69.8%, SlakeVQA: 62.3%, VQA-Rad: 49.9%. Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.9%, ScreenSpot: 95.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.5%, MMLU-Redux: 89.8%, AI2D: 89.5%.
Key differences include licensing (Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
MedGemma 4B IT is developed by Google and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.