MedGemma 4B IT vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B Comparison
Comparing MedGemma 4B IT and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
MedGemma 4B IT and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B has 392.7B more parameters than MedGemma 4B IT, making it 9132.6% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Qwen3.5-397B-A17B specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3.5-397B-A17B specifies output context (64,000 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both MedGemma 4B IT and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
MedGemma 4B IT
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
License
Usage and distribution terms
MedGemma 4B IT is licensed under Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use, while Qwen3.5-397B-A17B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
MedGemma 4B IT was released on 2025-05-20, while Qwen3.5-397B-A17B was released on 2026-02-16.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is 9 months newer than MedGemma 4B IT.
May 20, 2025
9 months ago
Feb 16, 2026
3 weeks ago
9mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|