Mercury 2 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking Comparison
Comparing Mercury 2 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Mercury 2 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (AIME 2025), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).
Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Mercury 2 ($0.25/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ($0.20/1M tokens).
For output processing, Mercury 2 ($0.75/1M tokens) is 1.3x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ($0.99/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is more expensive than Mercury 2.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Mercury 2's 128,000 tokens. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking can generate longer responses up to 32,768 tokens, while Mercury 2 is limited to 8,192 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mercury 2 does not.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Mercury 2
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
License
Usage and distribution terms
Mercury 2 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Mercury 2 was released on 2026-02-24, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.
Mercury 2 is 5 months newer than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.
Feb 24, 2026
2 weeks ago
5mo newerSep 22, 2025
5 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Mercury 2 is available from Inception. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is available from Novita, DeepInfra. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.
Mercury 2
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Mercury 2
View detailsInception
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|