Model Comparison

MiMo-V2-Flash vs MiniMax M1 40K

MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

MiMo-V2-Flash outperforms in 5 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MMLU-Pro, SWE-Bench Verified), while MiniMax M1 40K is better at 1 benchmark (LongBench v2).

MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Jun 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

147.0B diff

MiniMax M1 40K has 147.0B more parameters than MiMo-V2-Flash, making it 47.6% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
309.0Bparameters
MiniMax
MiniMax M1 40K
456.0Bparameters
309.0B
MiMo-V2-Flash
456.0B
MiniMax M1 40K

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2-Flash specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only MiMo-V2-Flash specifies output context (16,384 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input256,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
MiniMax
MiniMax M1 40K
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Jun 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

MiMo-V2-Flash

MIT

Open weights

MiniMax M1 40K

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2-Flash was released on 2025-12-16, while MiniMax M1 40K was released on 2025-06-16.

MiMo-V2-Flash is 6 months newer than MiniMax M1 40K.

MiMo-V2-Flash

Dec 16, 2025

5 months ago

6mo newer
MiniMax M1 40K

Jun 16, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Xiaomi
Larger context window (256,000 tokens)
Higher AIME 2025 score (94.1% vs 74.6%)
Higher GPQA score (83.7% vs 69.2%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (22.1% vs 7.2%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (84.9% vs 80.6%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (73.4% vs 55.6%)
MiniMax
Higher LongBench v2 score (61.0% vs 60.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
MiniMax
MiniMax M1 40K

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2-Flash vs MiniMax M1 40K.

Which is better, MiMo-V2-Flash or MiniMax M1 40K?

MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Flash is made by Xiaomi and MiniMax M1 40K is made by MiniMax. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does MiMo-V2-Flash compare to MiniMax M1 40K in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores AIME 2025: 94.1%, Arena-Hard v2: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 84.9%, HMMT 2025: 84.4%, GPQA: 83.7%. MiniMax M1 40K scores MATH-500: 96.0%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, MMLU-Pro: 80.6%, ZebraLogic: 80.1%, OpenAI-MRCR: 2 needle 128k: 76.1%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2-Flash and MiniMax M1 40K?

MiMo-V2-Flash supports 256K tokens and MiniMax M1 40K supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes MiMo-V2-Flash and MiniMax M1 40K?

MiMo-V2-Flash is developed by Xiaomi and MiniMax M1 40K is developed by MiniMax.