Model Comparison

MiMo-V2-Flash vs Nova Pro

MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Flash is 9.3x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

MiMo-V2-Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Nova Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2-Flash costs less

For input processing, MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.10/1M tokens) is 8.0x cheaper than Nova Pro ($0.80/1M tokens).

For output processing, MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.30/1M tokens) is 10.7x cheaper than Nova Pro ($3.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Nova Pro is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerXiaomi
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Nova Pro accepts 300,000 input tokens compared to MiMo-V2-Flash's 256,000 tokens. Nova Pro can generate longer responses up to 300,000 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Flash is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input256,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input300,000 tokens
Output300,000 tokens
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Nova Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Flash does not.

Nova Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiMo-V2-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Nova Pro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Nova Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2-Flash was released on 2025-12-16, while Nova Pro was released on 2024-11-20.

MiMo-V2-Flash is 13 months newer than Nova Pro.

MiMo-V2-Flash

Dec 16, 2025

4 months ago

1.1yr newer
Nova Pro

Nov 20, 2024

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

MiMo-V2-Flash is available from Xiaomi. Nova Pro is available from Bedrock.

MiMo-V2-Flash

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Nova Pro

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Xiaomi
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (83.7% vs 46.9%)
Amazon
Larger context window (300,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Amazon
Nova Pro

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2-Flash vs Nova Pro

MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Flash is made by Xiaomi and Nova Pro is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores AIME 2025: 94.1%, Arena-Hard v2: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 84.9%, HMMT 2025: 84.4%, GPQA: 83.7%. Nova Pro scores ARC-C: 94.8%, GSM8k: 94.8%, DocVQA: 93.5%, IFEval: 92.1%, ChartQA: 89.2%.
MiMo-V2-Flash is 8.0x cheaper for input tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via xiaomi. Nova Pro costs $0.80/M input and $3.20/M output via bedrock.
MiMo-V2-Flash supports 256K tokens and Nova Pro supports 300K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (256K vs 300K), input pricing ($0.10 vs $0.80/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
MiMo-V2-Flash is developed by Xiaomi and Nova Pro is developed by Amazon.