MiMo-V2-Flash vs Qwen3 32B Comparison

Comparing MiMo-V2-Flash and Qwen3 32B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

MiMo-V2-Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (AIME 2025), while Qwen3 32B is better at 0 benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 32B costs less

For input processing, MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.10/1M tokens) costs the same as Qwen3 32B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.30/1M tokens) costs the same as Qwen3 32B ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, MiMo-V2-Flash and Qwen3 32B cost the same.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

MiMo-V2-Flash

Input tokens$0.10

Output tokens$0.30

Best providerXiaomi

Qwen3 32B

Input tokens$0.10

Output tokens$0.30

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

276.2B diff

MiMo-V2-Flash has 276.2B more parameters than Qwen3 32B, making it 842.1% larger.

MiMo-V2-Flash

309.0Bparameters

Qwen3 32B

32.8Bparameters

309.0B

MiMo-V2-Flash

32.8B

Qwen3 32B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2-Flash accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 32B's 128,000 tokens. Qwen3 32B can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Flash is limited to 16,384 tokens.

MiMo-V2-Flash

Input256,000 tokens

Output16,384 tokens

Qwen3 32B

Input128,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2-Flash was released on 2025-12-16, while Qwen3 32B was released on 2025-04-29.

MiMo-V2-Flash is 8 months newer than Qwen3 32B.

MiMo-V2-Flash

Dec 16, 2025

2 months ago

7mo newer

Qwen3 32B

Apr 29, 2025

10 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

MiMo-V2-Flash is available from Xiaomi. Qwen3 32B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Sambanova. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.