The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiniCPM-SALA vs Qwen3.8-27B

Qwen3.8-27B leads the LLM Stats Score 46.1 to 12.7.

OpenBMB · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8-27B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 46.1 to 12.7, ranking #24 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8-27B wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiniCPM-SALA

  • you are already invested in the OpenBMB ecosystem

Choose Qwen3.8-27B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 46.1 and ranks #24 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
12.7
#230
46.1
#24
14.2
#214
45.6
#24
21.1
#80
34.5
#29
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
MiniCPM-SALA
Qwen3.8-27B
14.3#207
31.5#59
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

24 reported for MiniCPM-SALA · 26 for Qwen3.8-27B

1 shared

MiniCPM-SALA outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-27B is better at 1 benchmark (LiveCodeBench v6).

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

18.3B diff

Qwen3.8-27B has 18.3B more parameters than MiniCPM-SALA, making it 193.1% larger.

OpenBMB
MiniCPM-SALA
9.5Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-27B
27.8Bparameters
9.5B
MiniCPM-SALA
27.8B
Qwen3.8-27B

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8-27B supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiniCPM-SALA does not.

Qwen3.8-27B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiniCPM-SALA

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

MiniCPM-SALA

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3.8-27B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiniCPM-SALA was released on 2026-02-11, while Qwen3.8-27B was released on 2026-08-14.

Qwen3.8-27B is 6 months newer than MiniCPM-SALA.

MiniCPM-SALA

Feb 11, 2026

6 months ago

Qwen3.8-27B

Aug 14, 2026

2 weeks ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiniCPM-SALA and Qwen3.8-27B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiniCPM-SALA
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-27B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiniCPM-SALA vs Qwen3.8-27B.

Which is better, MiniCPM-SALA or Qwen3.8-27B?

Qwen3.8-27B leads the LLM Stats Score 46.1 to 12.7. MiniCPM-SALA is made by OpenBMB and Qwen3.8-27B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiniCPM-SALA compare to Qwen3.8-27B in benchmarks?

MiniCPM-SALA scores HumanEval: 95.1%, RULER 64k: 92.7%, RULER 128k: 89.4%, MBPP: 89.1%, RULER 512K: 87.1%. Qwen3.8-27B scores MathVision: 94.6%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.1%, LiveCodeBench v6: 90.3%, CharXiv-R: 90.2%, GPQA: 89.2%.

What are the main differences between MiniCPM-SALA and Qwen3.8-27B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (12.7 vs 46.1), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiniCPM-SALA and Qwen3.8-27B?

MiniCPM-SALA is developed by OpenBMB and Qwen3.8-27B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.