Model Comparison

MiniMax M2 vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

MiniMax M2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: MiniMax M2 vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct — which is better?

MiniMax M2 (by MiniMax) and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

MiniMax M2 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks. MiniMax M2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose MiniMax M2 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2025

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct if…

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

MiniMax M2 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

MiniMax M2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Jul 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

196.5B diff

MiniMax M2 has 196.5B more parameters than Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct, making it 586.6% larger.

MiniMax
MiniMax M2
230.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
33.5Bparameters
230.0B
MiniMax M2
33.5B
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiniMax M2 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only MiniMax M2 specifies output context (1,000,000 tokens).

MiniMax
MiniMax M2
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output1,000,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Jul 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiniMax M2 does not.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiniMax M2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiniMax M2 is licensed under MIT, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiniMax M2

MIT

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiniMax M2 was released on 2025-10-27, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-02-28.

MiniMax M2 is 8 months newer than Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct.

MiniMax M2

Oct 27, 2025

9 months ago

8mo newer
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Feb 28, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (78.0% vs 46.0%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (82.0% vs 68.8%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiniMax M2 and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiniMax M2
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
MiniMax
MiniMax M2
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about MiniMax M2 vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, MiniMax M2 or Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

MiniMax M2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. MiniMax M2 is made by MiniMax and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does MiniMax M2 compare to Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

MiniMax M2 scores Tau2 Telecom: 87.0%, LiveCodeBench: 83.0%, MMLU-Pro: 82.0%, AIME 2025: 78.0%, GPQA: 78.0%. Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQA: 94.8%, Android Control Low_EM: 93.3%, HumanEval: 91.5%, ScreenSpot: 88.5%, MBPP: 84.0%.

What are the context window sizes for MiniMax M2 and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

MiniMax M2 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiniMax M2 and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiniMax M2 and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

MiniMax M2 is developed by MiniMax and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.