Model Comparison

MiniMax M2 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct

MiniMax M2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is 1.1x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

MiniMax M2 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, MMLU-Pro, Tau2 Telecom), while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

MiniMax M2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed May 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct costs less

For input processing, MiniMax M2 ($0.30/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, MiniMax M2 ($1.20/1M tokens) is 1.3x cheaper than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct ($1.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, MiniMax M2 is more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed May 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
MiniMax
MiniMax M2
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerMiniMax
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

150.0B diff

MiniMax M2 has 150.0B more parameters than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct, making it 187.5% larger.

MiniMax
MiniMax M2
230.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
80.0Bparameters
230.0B
MiniMax M2
80.0B
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiniMax M2 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct's 65,536 tokens. MiniMax M2 can generate longer responses up to 1,000,000 tokens, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is limited to 65,536 tokens.

MiniMax
MiniMax M2
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output1,000,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Input65,536 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Wed May 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiniMax M2 is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiniMax M2

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiniMax M2 was released on 2025-10-27, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct was released on 2025-09-10.

MiniMax M2 is 2 months newer than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct.

MiniMax M2

Oct 27, 2025

6 months ago

1mo newer
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct

Sep 10, 2025

8 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

MiniMax M2 is available from MiniMax, Novita. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is available from Novita.

MiniMax M2

minimax logo
MiniMax
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Less expensive output tokens
Higher AIME 2025 score (78.0% vs 69.5%)
Higher GPQA score (78.0% vs 72.9%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (82.0% vs 80.6%)
Higher Tau2 Telecom score (87.0% vs 13.2%)
Less expensive input tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
MiniMax
MiniMax M2
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about MiniMax M2 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct.

Which is better, MiniMax M2 or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?

MiniMax M2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. MiniMax M2 is made by MiniMax and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does MiniMax M2 compare to Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct in benchmarks?

MiniMax M2 scores Tau2 Telecom: 87.0%, LiveCodeBench: 83.0%, MMLU-Pro: 82.0%, AIME 2025: 78.0%, GPQA: 78.0%. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct scores MMLU-Redux: 90.9%, MultiPL-E: 87.8%, IFEval: 87.6%, WritingBench: 87.3%, Creative Writing v3: 85.3%.

Is MiniMax M2 cheaper than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. MiniMax M2 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via minimax. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct costs $0.15/M input and $1.50/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for MiniMax M2 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?

MiniMax M2 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct supports 66K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiniMax M2 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 66K), input pricing ($0.30 vs $0.15/M), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiniMax M2 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct?

MiniMax M2 is developed by MiniMax and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.