MiniStral 3 (14B Instruct 2512) vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct Comparison
Comparing MiniStral 3 (14B Instruct 2512) and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
MiniStral 3 (14B Instruct 2512) outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MATH), while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.
MiniStral 3 (14B Instruct 2512) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct has 19.5B more parameters than MiniStral 3 (14B Instruct 2512), making it 139.3% larger.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both MiniStral 3 (14B Instruct 2512) and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
MiniStral 3 (14B Instruct 2512)
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.
Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
MiniStral 3 (14B Instruct 2512) was released on 2025-12-04, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-02-28.
MiniStral 3 (14B Instruct 2512) is 9 months newer than Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct.
Dec 4, 2025
3 months ago
9mo newerFeb 28, 2025
1.0 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|